“Occupy Wall Street” radfem handouts

for those participating in “occupy” protests worldwide and want to distribute radfem literature, theses brochures have been uploaded to HUB in both MS Word and PDF.  please print or link and disseminate widely.

Brochure #1

“Occupy Wall Street is a men’s movement.  It doesn’t have to be this way.”

MS Word here and PDF here.  brochure is intended to be printed on one page, two-sided, and folded into thirds.  text below.

Women as a sexual class around the world share the following concerns:

°         Equal pay and property ownership for women

°         Rape, coercion and abuse of women in the sex industry

°         Rape and sexual abuse of women by men in all contexts

°         Global maternal morbidity and mortality rates, and female infanticide

°         The harms of mandatory penis-in-vagina sex (PIV), including unwanted pregnancy

°         Patriarchal institutions that cater to male interests at women’s expense

OWS must centralize the concerns of women.  WHY?

Women are the majority on the planet: we are the 51%.  That’s why.

Together, both globally and locally, women and children vastly outnumber adult men, especially white men.  Yet, to date, OWS has centralized men’s interests and particularly white men’s interests, even though they are a tiny minority of the global and local population.

The men of OWS do not have women’s best interests at heart. 

If women no longer performed free labor for men, including sexual and domestic labor, the current economic system as we know it would come crashing down.

And if the billion-dollar global sex industry were eliminated, the effects would be far-reaching and undeniable.  Economically powerful men – many in the top 1% — would be rendered powerless.

But we don’t see the men of OWS advocating for these changes, even though they say they abhor the current system and they want it to fail.

Why?

Because all men benefit from the status quo.

All men, including the men of OWS both individually and collectively benefit from women’s sexual, domestic and reproductive slavery.

That’s why.

And they do not want this to change.  But that’s not the only problem with the male-centric vision of OWS.

The conditions for women at OWS offer a glimpse of what “success” would look like, if OWS succeeded.  It does not look good.

Women’s concerns are marginalized and we are expected to support men’s concerns first and foremost, and adopt them as our own.

Women are cooking, cleaning and serving men, as men claim all the leadership positions and positions of power and prestige for themselves.

Male-centric sexuality that poses known dangers to girls and women, specifically the risk of unwanted pregnancy is over-represented, and female-centric sexuality that is safe for girls and women is under-represented.  Women have been groped and assaulted at OWS by male protesters and by the police.

What would it look like if women were really free?

-Conserving women’s energy.  Women’s concerns would be centralized, and our time, energy and resources invested in women and creating and maintaining female-centric space, policies and practices for our own benefit.

-No more rape.  Women and children would be free from sexualized violence and the threat of sexualized violence, and we would never be the victims of rape or coerced to enter the sex industry no matter how poor we were.

-No more unwanted pregnancy.  Female-centric sexuality would be the ideal, and female sexual pleasure would be a priority.  Girls and women would not be subjected to unwanted pregnancy through dangerous PIV-centric sex.

-Financial independence.  Women would not rely on men for economic security, through marriage, the nuclear family, government benefits or employment.  Women’s very survival would never be dependent on pleasing men.

-Women matter.  Women’s voices would be heard, and women’s reality would be acknowledged and deferred to, including our lived experience as female-bodied persons who, on a global scale, menstruate, gestate, give birth and lactate.

-Intellectual freedom.  Women-only space would be respected and free from male-centrism in all its forms.  We would be free to go to the ends of our thoughts on every issue as we imagine a better future for us all, including a possible future with men on the periphery, or one that does not include men at all.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Brochure #2

“Femininity is pro-capitalist.  Fuckability is pro-capitalist.” MS Word is here; PDF is here.  this brochure is meant to be printed on one page, double-sided and folded once.

women make less and we spend more.  on being fuckable.  and for what?
-we can’t invest as much as men -we can’t save as much as men  -investing in our appearance is not a secure investment -we risk extreme poverty in old age.

fuckability mandates are oppressive.
-there is no meaningful choice to “opt out”
-women’s time, energy and $money$ are not ours
-perfect fuckability is unattainable and the standard is constantly changing.

men benefit from women wasting our resources.
-men make more and spend less
-men’s relative economic power increases as ours decreases
-”equal pay” is meaningless if women have to spend more to make the same amount; not that “equal pay” for women is even being addressed at OWS or anywhere.

eye candy as far as the eye can see.
-all of this is very sexxxay, if you are a man.
-women’s vulnerability, including financial vulnerability is fetishized and sexualized.

men have no motivation to end this.  NOW.
-WE DO.  WE ARE THE 51%.

11 Responses to ““Occupy Wall Street” radfem handouts”

  1. happy protesting everyone! please let us know how and where you use these materials. thanks for reading!

  2. You women are fanfuckingTASTIC! Thanks for existing. You give me hope.
    Robin Morgan

  3. ((( Robin ))), in 1970, you gave me hope!

    :-D

    I read and re-read “Sisterhood Is Powerful” until the pages fell out, then I grabbed the SCUM Manifesto, and never looked back. Lesbian separatism was ready in Berkeley and Oakland to embrace me with open arms.

    It’s happening again. Sorta, kinda, maybe. It’s a great run-up to the collapse of the $$$ system which is inevitable because of climate change.

    Yeah, these women have given me hope that I thought I would never feel it again.

  4. You’re terrific! Thanks for the kind words–hope for hope. (One small carping nitpick: think of the etymological root for “disseminate” and you might want to discard it as I have; now I simply use ‘distribute’ instead.)

    ;-D

  5. haha yes i thought that sounded familiar. distribute is better.

  6. Thank you so much, RadFems, for these handouts! I will be Facebooking them to local OWS and their supporters, and handing them out at the local NOW meeting. I get so tired of hearing older women activists and liberals saying “We need to support OWS because they’re young people and we need to encourage their activism.” Not me. The whole thing has such a male, male-dominant approach and vibe. I would never feel safe camping out with those men, none of it has been designed for women’s safety.

    And who are these 99%?? People earning “just” $55,000/year are part of the global 1%! Writing as someone who has lived on no more than $15k/year her whole life, how many among us, myself included, can say we are not greedy and lavishing ourselves daily with what would be sheer luxuries for most of the people on the planet? The cry of “we are the 99%” is encouraging the average American to not look in the mirror and change how WE live, as a role model for each other and those more affluent, and as a way of directly helping the economy, ourselves, to scale down and become more sustainable and re-localized. Driving one’s gas-guzzler to the protest and back to a professionally decorated, heated loft, suburban house, or retiring to the tent and down sleeping bag Mom and Dad bought, then heading back to that $20 – 50,000/year college is kinda overlooking a few things about our contributions to the dwindling finite resources upon which any economy is based. After all, money is just a paper representation of natural resources, and it isn’t just the super-rich in America who are gobbling them up.

    Protesting, itself, I’ve come to realize, is male. It’s a softer, gentler form of war and trying to force others to do something we want them to do, through throngs of upset people protesting.

    As Sonia Johnson so eloquently explained in her book, “Going Out of Our Minds,” protesting is an act of powerlessness, and reinforces powerlessness, both in the eyes of those “in power,” and in the self-perceptions of the protestors, which is why we tend to get so angry when protesting (as with the OWSers who march and end up smashing bank windows.) It’s an act of frustration and powerlessness.

    True power is to either start on one’s own, or to gather with people with similar concerns, and identify what is not working, and to carefully figure out and create an alternative that can begin to supplant what isn’t working, starting on a small scale until it is perfected and then continuing to grow it from there, as more people embrace the emerging alternative. (Examples: organic home gardening leading to organic farming on an increasing scale; the advent of curbside recycling, which began in one neighborhood with a pickup truck, and then spread to other communities, with vehicles gradually modified for easier pick-up. These are examples of good ideas starting on a small scale and being passed along and grown as more people saw their value. Another example was women’s consciousness raising groups back in the ’70s, and women’s presses, bookstores, music producers, entrepreneurs, etc.)

    This approach to cultural transformation, and how it can pull us out of our mounting, massive economic, social, and environmental problems in the last gasps of the declining Industrial Era, are beautifully and brilliantly described in Duane Elgin’s book, “Voluntary Simplicity,” regarding how small, individual experiments in simple living can build into alternatives that gradually supplant those practices and institutions that are not working and are not up-to-date thinking anymore, and are not sustainable. No confrontation is required: that’s a waste of time, energy, and resources (such as all those shattered bank windows, extra policing costs, and gas-guzzling SUVs being driven to the protests.)

    This approach also applies to group processes. I LOVE your statement, “A successful revolution must be led by women. No more false solidarity!” Brilliant, and absolutely true. Thank you!

    And to Robin Morgan, THANK YOU for all of your wonderful work. I still have my dog-eared copy of Sisterhood is Powerful. And your explanation of the title of your book, “Going Too Far,” I have shared with countless feminists and anti-feminists over the years, to help move them past the fear of inevitably being told their feminism is “going too far” by realizing that feminist women have ALWAYS been told we are going too far, to keep us in our place! As the anti-Iraq war and more recently as OWS started up, your first and later versions of “Goodbye to All That” have been invaluable to distribute to those who would allow men to be bullies in charge of those movements! So thank you :)

  7. Thanks, Alice, for the kind words and good politics. You might also get a lift from my recent piece for The Women’s Media Center on “Occupying Occupy”: http://womensmediacenter.com/blog/2012/01/exclusive-occupying-the-occupy-movement/

Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 311 other followers