5 Impressive Hacks That Will Save Your iOS Testing Budget
Did you know that iOS is currently the glitchiest mobile OS in the market right now? Android has 80% less bugs and vulnerabilities than iOS as stated by the National Vulnerability Database. Sure most of the defects come from 3-d party software providers like payment API providers or server hosting, etc. But do you think your users will care whose fault the theft of their credentials in your app was?
Why is this happening? A lot of app manufacturers tend to overlook quality. Native testing on iOS is quite expensive meaning countless new startups can’t handle the pressure. They simply don’t have enough funds to invest into quality. As the result their solutions are ruining the entire eco system in the app store and Apple users are open to threats and vulnerabilities.
Luckily www.deviqa.com QA experts have the perfect solution! Check out the following tips to make iOS testing cheaper.
iOS quality assurance should not cist a small fortune
There is no such thing as untreatable code. If your team experiences QA difficulties with any given piece of functionality because the classes are too big, methods have too many actions or whatever – change that piece. Make it testable. This way you will simplify your work and save thousands in the long run.
Ensure your team has strict rules to follow. Some of the ,ore basic examples of common rules are:
- Single responsibility: every single class in an iOS app can only have one responsibility.
- Dependency inversion: Use protocols to break classes down and test independent parts. This may seem like more work but attending a project in clusters is simpler, faster and more efficient. This way you will invest more from the start to save cash on re-working later.
Test in the field: test your app on real devices, not emulators. Do it in the subway or under peek loads or while connections are poor. It’s not hard to run around with a phone, the process takes less than a day but the results are immensely powerful.
Don’t automate everything: tools are expensive and too narrow meaning you won’t afford all of them. Prioritize the categories that require mechanic assistance and test the rest manually. Remember that automated tests have no means to evaluate UI or UX.
If you are using tools, attend to the best. Your options should include: Frank, Appium, Calabash, Specta and Quick.
And that’s pretty much it. Simply follow these rules and compare the results. The odds are you will be investing 25-55% less on Quality Assurance in the long run.